What Think the Candidates? (3)

So far several candidates have been collecting substantial funding for their campaigns.  Hopefully, we will hear from one or more candidates on the themes of their campaign and their thoughts on the main public issues in Coral Gables.

See the pages on this blog–A CITY AGENDA and CANDIDATESfor current information on the candidates and important public issues in Coral Gables.

Take Note Coral Gables Commissioners: Unpleasant, but Necessary for the Taxpayers

This is probably hurting the firefighter chiefs and officers more than it is hurting the lower ranks.  The upper limit on retirement is unpleasant, but essential.  It is too bad that firefighter unions were so greedy–they are to blame equally with politicians that get us into this stew.

“It’s a very painful time for us,” said Robert Suarez, president of the Miami Association of Firefighters. “Our firefighters are very upset. We are looking at 20 to 30 percent pay cuts. The attendance of the mayor and commissioners would have created a hostile event out of something that is very positive.”

Firefighter salaries were cut between 5 and 12 percent. But after factoring in cuts to other bonuses for education or specialized jobs, union leaders say the actual cuts are more than double. Pensions were also capped at a $100,000 a year payout. The moves were designed to help close a $105 million city budget hole and avoid laying off one-third of the city’s workforce.

via At union’s request, Miami leaders stay away from new fire station – Miami-Dade – MiamiHerald.com.

Constitutional Amendment No. 2: Collins Center for Public Policy

AT A GLANCE: AMENDMENT 2

Sponsor/Originator: The Florida Legislature

Title on Ballot: Homestead ad valorem tax credit for

deployed military personnel

Official Summary: Proposing an amendment to the

State Constitution to require the Legislature to provide

an additional homestead property tax exemption

for members of the United States military or military

reserves, the United States Coast Guard or its

reserves, or the Florida National Guard who receive

a homestead exemption and were deployed in the

previous year on active duty outside the continental

United States, Alaska, or Hawaii in support of military

operations designated by the Legislature. The exempt

amount will be based upon the number of days in the

previous calendar year that the person was deployed.

The amendment is scheduled to take effect Jan. 1, 2011.

What it would do: Instruct the Legislature to enact an

additional homestead exemption for Florida homeowners

on active military service outside the country. The size

of the tax break would be based on the amount of time

served overseas in the previous year.

Arguments for: Military personnel based overseas

are performing important services for our country at

considerable sacrifice. This amendment would help

compensate them for that service.

Arguments against: Providing an additional exemption

to certain property owners would reduce tax collections

by hard-pressed local governments.

Constitutional Amendment No. 1: Collins Center for Public Policy

AT A GLANCE: AMENDMENT 1

Sponsor/Originator: The Florida Legislature

Title on Ballot: Repeal of public campaign financing

requirement

Official Summary: Proposing the repeal of the

provision in the State Constitution that requires

public financing of campaigns of candidates for elective

statewide office who agree to campaign spending limits

What it would do: Amendment 1 would end the

constitutional requirement for taxpayer financing of

political campaigns.

Arguments for: The state is experiencing tight financial

times. It makes no sense to spend taxpayers’ money

to subsidize campaigns when candidates can raise the

money themselves.

Arguments against: The people voted overwhelmingly

for the present public financing requirement 13 years

ago. Public financing reduces the effect of money on

politics and can open the door for candidates to run

without big-money backers.