UM Complains Against City of Coral Gables

Link to MiamiHerald.com | 01/18/2007 | UM blames Coral Gables for $50M in delays

Authorities (President and Board of Trustee members) of the University of Miami raised fierce public complaints against the City of Coral Gables for delays claimed in approving changes in the University’s Master Development Plan. Mayor Slesnick clearly layed out the history of the issue with the City. The City Manager responded that the UM had not reached a development agreement that would have included impact payments (in lieu of property taxes) to the city for services provided to the university and the increasing effects of the universities growth on adjacent residential areas. The university going public seems like a crude and heavy handed negotiating ploy to publically pressure the City to convey agreement to a long list of changes in its master plan, whose consequences have not been properly studied.

The university held only one meeting to consult with Coral Gables’ residents on the proposed changes–far too little for a plan that encompasses more than 25 categories of changes in the construction program. This nominal consultation seems to stem from a distrust by the university of residents (who complained for past developments) and fear of mobilizing the community against the changes some of which may have non-trivial impacts on the community.

One of the greatest concerns of the local residents is the rapid increase in traffic around the university and the lack of disincentives for students to drive their cars to the university.

Another issue is that the Master Plan seems to involve pushing the less desirable buildings (especially parking garages) to the fringes of the university and moving the construction of these facilities bordering closer to community streets.

One may wonder if the university could try to architectually and esthetically project out to the community with a better face, moving the parking into the campus, create incentives and systems to discourage students from parking on the fringes of the university campus and build the campus vertically.

The new aggressive approach of the university is not likely engender and gain support from the local community.

Coral Gables Public Hearing: UM Proposes 25 Amendments to its Master Plan

On January 10 the City of Coral Gables Planning and Zoning Board will take up many, many changes in the UM Master Plan that will certainly affect the community through the construction of parking garages, demolition of buildings, additions to buidlings, the construction of housing on the Granada Blvd “park”, reduction of the university setback on Ponce de Leon, and many other elements to be changed that cannot be listed here as well as contemplating the enormous increase in traffic that will accompany these changes. The meeting will take place on January 10 at 6:00 p.m. and the Citiy Commission will take up the changes on January 23 and February 13.

The City of Coral Gables Planning Staff Recommendations can be found on the Internet at http://www.coralgables.com/NR/rdonlyres/DF4B2E7C-0413-465E-8F39-6F78868A95F3/804/011007UMCAD2006StaffReport.pdf

Miami-Dade Watershed Plan: Prescription for Future Development

The recent editorial of the Miami Herald summarizes the background and some of the major conclusions of the outstanding study on Miam-Dade Watershed Plan.

An obvious conclusion of policies to restrict the westward development of the county is to intensify development existing towns, especially along the areas close to the Metro. This will lead to considerable vertical development along Dixie Highway from Miami south through Coral Gables, Kendall (see the start of that process around Dadeland Mall) and further south.

Based on population projections and available developable land, the county should not expand the Urban Development Boundary until after 2025

The density along U.S. 1 in several South Miami-Dade cities should be increased to promote infill projects and increase the number of residents to support mass transit — Metrorail — along the corridor to alleviate traffic congestion.

The study determined how much open land is needed to buffer Biscayne park

Reverse the concurrency process. In other words, rather than wait for completed projects to create the demand for sewer and water lines, roads, etc., use the planning process to anticipate where future growth will be and build infrastructure before construction begins.

Link to MiamiHerald.com | 01/07/2007 | Future is now: Sprawl or smart growth?

Where is the "City Beautiful"

Miami Today reports on the possible conflict among the “Cities’ Beautiful”:

Orlando’s application to federally trademark longtime slogan The City Beautiful is in the initial stages of approval, leaving Coral Gables, which also uses the name, about a month to negotiate shared usage before a formal objection period begins.
Coral Gables, which has called itself The City Beautiful since the 1930s, also was seeking the trademark but applied almost two months after Orlando filed its application.
The cities, officials say, will work together for shared use of the name.
“We’re now negotiating a joint-use agreement so everybody wins,” said David Brown, Coral Gables city manager.
City attorney Elizabeth Hernandez said lodging an official objection is Plan B.
“The cities are working to get the benefit of the usage of the names,” she said in an e-mail.Ý”Unless we come to agreement, we will object to each other’s applications.ÝI know we are all working toward resolution of this matter.”Ý
Attorney David Rogero, handling the process for Coral Gables, said representatives of both cities will begin negotiations soon for concurrent use of the slogan.