Is the City Commission and the Mayor Really Doing their Homework?

I wonder about this because of the few questions and comments coming from the dais during the budget hearing.

Do you puzzle over–based on questions raised or not raised–whether the city commissioners and mayor are doing their homework; I have my doubts.  It seems more often that the commissioners and mayor come to the dais without having done the detailed time-consuming homework or examination of legislation, budgets and master plan modifications, on which they are going to rule. Perhaps they assume that the boards are doing the work, but more than once the Commission goes against the decisions of the boards, or ignores their ideas completely.  So it is not that.

How many times have the commissioners and mayor raised serious questions about the budget execution during the year.  I think a very few times, if any.  Their response to citizen comments, while not entirely disrespectful, are generally testy on fundamental issues of taxes, spending, salaries, pensions, organization, etc.  Too often the presentation of the Director of Finance boarders on the insulting to taxpayers, and he seems to be operating under strict instructions of the city manager.

Why is there a culture of secrets, a closed government in the city of Coral Gables?

Why have we not gotten a report from the city manager on the purposes and progress in reorganizing government?

Why does the commission spend time on issues like leaf blowers and the Boy Scout House that seem to be simple distractions from the deeper problems of the city, a sort of entertainment for citizens.

Citizen Groups in Coral Gables?

Where are they, who are they and why don’t they respond regularly to the problems of the community.

This reflects endemic voter indifference.

Commission and Mayor Feel Censured by the Boy Scouts

If we take the following quotes at face value it seems that our city leader is too focused on  the regular criticisms of Mr. Burr.  Also, I wasn’t aware the city commission is so conscious of criticism, since they have largely ignored disapproving comments from citizens on the city’s financial crises (predicted by many), the problems with the now defunct, resigned and richly rewarded, incompetent city manager, Mr. David Brown (incompetence predicted by many), the continuing Biltmore debacle, the Country Club mess, the sagging Miracle Mile business sector (unresolved by the famous BID), the pretentious museum, the leaf blower crisis and now the Boy Scouts House lease crisis.

I think it is normal in the politics of our time to regularly attack commissioners and the mayor (who are in the proverbial kitchen, but, seemingly, can’t take the heat).

In short

The mayor, in turn, accused Burr of using the media to distort the real issue — the proper use of the Scout house — to attack the commission.

“We are not going to take anyone out of the Scout house,” Slesnick said.

He added: “I have no political vendetta against Robert Burr. He doesn’t like me. He wants me out as mayor.”

Both men have been at odds before. In 2007, Burr supported Slesnick’s mayoral opponents — activist Richard Namon and former Mayor George Corrigan. Slesnick won.

via Gables backs down from evicting Boy Scout troop – Coral Gables – MiamiHerald.com.

Better No Tax Cut for Anyone–Save $3.7 trillion in Debt

The argument is simple enough.  Do not reinstate the tax cuts for all taxpayers.  The actual final spending impact is small, the middle class loses $888/family and the group with millions in income get $100’s of thousands/taxpayer.  Better to save the debt and cut the deficit by $3.7 million in tax cuts.

The question is: Is it better to extend the tax cuts for everyone or for no one? The answer is to extend them for no one.

The Bush tax cuts have always overwhelmingly benefited the rich, not the middle class, and that is no less true today than when they were enacted. They were bad policy then and they are bad policy today. Extending the tax cuts would dramatically enrich the wealthy relative to everyone else. 65.5 percent of the total benefit would go to the top quintile by income, 26.8 percent to the top 1 percent, and 14.7 percent to the top 0.1 percent.*

via Dear Mr. President « The Baseline Scenario.