Good Management and Major Projects in Coral Gables

In further reading of the Mayor’s_State_of_the_City_Address_2010 I am struck by his good defense of good management and better city organization.  Better management is a good step forward for the city and all are to be congratulated for this.  Witness the relative success of the the new city manager and his quiet, ambitious steps to bring in good people and restructure some of the management units.

In his speech,the mayor singles out three major successful projects: the Biltmore lease agreement, the “re-birth” of the Coral Gables Country Club and the University of Miami Development Agreement.  All three of them came about as problems, or were delayed, because of weak city management that let problems run until they became crises.

However, still there is much to do.

  • The Biltmore lease still seems much like a postponement of a problem before the current budget cycle, pending negotiation of a long-term agreement between the city and the lessee.
  • The Coral Gables Country Club arrangement has yet to prove itself after having been restricted by the city commission.
  • The University of Miami Agreement, while certainly important, has the feeling of being rushed through because of the possible approval of a constitutional change in Florida, Amendment 4, that might put land us plan modifications in the hands of voters.

Amendment 4.  Establishes that before a local government may adopt a new comprehensive land use plan, or amend a comprehensive land use plan, the proposed plan or amendment shall be subject to vote of the electors of the local government by referendum, following preparation by the local planning agency, consideration by the governing body and notice.

Therefore, the major projects are still mostly projects and agreements; they are important achievements, but they have yet to prove their viability and worth to the community. Time will tell.

Deferring Benefits: Would that have happened in Coral Gables?

I wonder what sacrifices the city’s management, commissioners and mayor are willing to make for the good of the city.

So far there is no evidence that the city leaders are willing to take the lead in making sacrifices for the city.  Indeed, more than once we have heard that we have to keep employees, salaries and benefits up to sustain our quality of life.  Who is willing to forgo some of their salaries and benefits to demonstrate to the unions that they will lead the city in a time of sacrifice.  Will the candidates for public office make a pledge to work ad honorem for the well being of the city.

Florida A&M University President James Ammons says he’s deferring an $80,000 performance bonus due to tough economic times.

via Florida college president says he’s deferring $80K bonus – Miami-Dade Breaking News – MiamiHerald.com.

Simple Acts of Citizen Engagement for the City of Coral Gables

What kinds of new citizen engagement could be undertaken in Coral Gables that would increase community participation and input into the most important decision of the community.

Here are some simple community initiatives for the city manager and the commission that would cost little to do.

  • Send out an email to the citizens announcing all meetings of boards, committees and the commission; similar distribute agendas and minutes.
  • Send via email or included in the the city’s website results information on the execution of the budget.
  • During the year organize a series of public forums in neighborhoods on the annual budget and to report on important investments and spending.
  • Have meeting with business groups and citizens to discuss the economic and business future of Coral Gables (UM could be asked to lead the discussions.).
  • Create an online forum so people could contribute ideas the city (civility required).
  • Make public presentations by the city manager and department directors to explain their work.

Please contribute your ideas to this list.

Legacy of the “Slesnick Commission”

The city is nearing the close of an era and we may be getting a different commission next year.  The end of what we might call the “Slesnick Commission” has left a background of living through a bubble economy, a break down in management oversight and an abortive adaptation to changing economic conditions.

The next commission and mayor will find:

  • Still a bloated government;
  • A pattern of relentless property tax increases in goods times and in bad;
  • Mismanagement of the Country Club lease;
  • Mismanagement of the Biltmore Hotel lease;
  • A $200 million (to date)  pension liability;
  • An accumulation of unsustainable salaries and benefits;
  • A contracting tax base;
  • A resistance to building the edifice of a modern, open, well organized government with the participation of residents in significant decisions;
  • Weak and compliant city boards;
  • Unwelcome and costly projects, such as the new museum;
  • A government without an apparent strategy to promote new industries and businesses in new growth clusters; and
  • The end of large-scale commercial and residential real estate development for long period.

Certainly, there have been achievements of the commission, but they are swamped by the problems.  Some of these problems are not the blame of the commission, including the inevitable economic collapse.  But the reaction of the City of Coral Gables to the crisis has been insipid.