Internet and Social Media Commandments: For Egypt and Coral Gables. (Thanks to “BuzzMachine.”)

I have found this posting on the value of the internet and social media to revolutions and social change to be very edifying in the context of the revolution in Egypt.

Similarly, it gives some interesting perspectives on the use of the internet by our small town, the city of Coral Gables.

It is impressive to me that the internet is used mostly by city government as a one way information flow.  There is very little collecting of information;  the many times I have tried to use it to get feedback from a city department on a neighborhood problem, nothing has happened (well, maybe once). The city’s website is more like an empty blackboard than a telephone or email.  Yes, certain financial information is published, but budgets are pretty theoretical and we never see the same budget, in the same format, at the end of the year to see what really happened to the money and the revenues.  This theatrics and not transparency.

I am impressed that the candidates for public office set up really beautiful websites and some ask for questions (which I assume they answer), and that is great.  Wouldn’t it be wonderful if this same interest in the voters would carry over more to than 3 minute responses during commission meetings.  That is about it.

The following is a list of internet and social media rights–commandments–that local governments could beneficially think about in their communications with the community.  Read the original long post if you are interested.

…I keep calling for a discussion about an independent set of principles for cyberspace so we can hold them over the heads of governments and corporations that would restrict and control our tools of publicness. I keep revising my list of principles, from this, to this, to this, to this:

I. We have a right to connect.

II. We have the right to speak.

III. We have the right to assemble & act

IV. Privacy is a responsibility of knowing.

V. Publicness is a responsibility of sharing.

VI. Information should be public by default, secret by necessity.

VII. What is public is a public good.

VIII. All bits are created equal.

IX. The internet shall be operated openly.

X. The internet shall be distributed.

This, to me, is a far more fruitful discussion than whether Facebook and Twitter deserves credit for Egypt and Tunisia. The revolutionaries deserve credit. They also deserve the freedom to use the tools of their revolutions.

via Gutenberg of Arabia « BuzzMachine.

Transition in Egypt: Lessons from a Little Country

Having lived through the postwar political and economic transition in El Salvador starting in 1992, several big issues come to my mind that the Egyptians will have to face. (I agree, El Salvador and Egypt have very different historical origins and peoples.)

One major task is to reform the police force.  A big problem when you have a police force that has been an agent of the dictatorship, rather than protecting the community, and when the police have violated human rights through torturing, assassinating and making arbitrary arrests,  an urgent task is to reform the police force.  You have to kick out the worst elements, retrain the new forces and bring in people who represents diverse elements of society, inculcating a culture of human rights and installing an accepted  civilian leadership.  You have to create trust with the police, and this is urgent for the transition to democracy.

Secondly, kicking out the worst elements of the police will probably increase personal violence, kidnappings, etc. because you putting on the street the worst social elements of the police.  This was especially bad in El Salvador and crime and violence has been a major force constraining economic development in El Salvador.

Thirdly, the pervasive corruption in the Mubarak period cannot be changed over night and, in effect, it may never be changed,  but only scaled down somewhat.  This will depend on how hard civil society works against corruption.  New government procurement measures will change gradually and with fresh, honest leadership, but there will be huge resistance to alter the patterns of corruption with more government transparency, because of the large numbers of people who benefit from the system.

Fourth, the legal system has to be reformed. The courts absolutely have to be trusted, the selection of judges must be moved out of the political system and people have to see that justice is being meted out.

The political system has to be thrown open, while the lack of political organizations and experience will take a long time to create.  For example, it has been twenty years for the opposition party in El Salvador to elect a president (the current one).  The key is participation, financing political organization for the creation of trust in the community.  (El Salvador is a very different case because the major opposition party, the FMLN, represents the ex-guerrilla movement.)

There are many other elements that go into a real political transition, but the above are essential, and I have not commented on the need for a “truth” or “human rights” commission to establish a transparent history.

Egypt, Can it Be?

Can it be that a country has brought about peaceful change without the intervention of the US.

This must be Egyptian exceptionalism.

Can it Be?

Can it be that the biggest country in the Middle East is solving its own problems without the intervention of America?

This is an important lesson for US foreign policy makers who think that the first step to democracy is war and intervention.  Nonviolent demonstrations won out over trillion dollar wars and thousands of the deaths.

The Egyptian people can now claim a special place in history of democratic reforms–and without outside help.

Egypt!

Following current events on Al Jazeera English on the internet.  Very good coverage with many different views to balance excellent coverage on CNN.

It is a shame that Comcast and others are not willing to include Al Jazeera English.

http://english.aljazeera.net/watch_now/