Proof Coral Gables Police and Firefighters are Greatly Overpaid

There is no problem in filling the posts of police and firefighters in Coral Gables.  I imagine that there is a line of people waiting for these jobs.  Ergo, police and firefighters are overpaid because there are plenty of candidates at the current wage.  Also, if we can’t hire more because of the limited budget, they are overpaid.  This describe Coral Gables.

I am sorry, but I do not believe it is relevant to ask how educated they are. Using sanitation workers as an example, I would put it this way.

If you do not have enough sanitation workers because you cannot fill job openings at the current level of pay, then those government workers are underpaid.

On the other hand, if you do not have enough sanitation workers because your budget is busted by the ones you have, then those government workers are overpaid.

Basic microeconomics.

via How to Tell if Public Sector Workers are Overpaid, Arnold Kling | EconLog | Library of Economics and Liberty.

Obama as a Republican

If you thought things might have “changed” with Obama.

Forget it.

If you are a Republican, you could have hardly asked for a better guy.

Nearly 44 million people were living in poverty in 2009, which was more than 14 percent of the American population and a jump of four million from the previous year. Anyone who thinks things are much better now is delirious. More than 15 million children are poor — one of every five kids in the United States. More than a quarter of all blacks and a similar percentage of Hispanics are poor.

Are we doing anything about this? No. Our government officials, from the president on down, are too busy kissing the bejeweled fingers of the megarich.

…

Hardly anyone cares. Hardly anyone even notices.

With the tax cuts for the rich saved and William Daley coming on board, the atmosphere is being readied for Obama & Co. to tap the fat cats for the zillions necessary for next year’s re-election run. And that, of course, is the only thing that really matters.

via Misery With Plenty of Company – NYTimes.com.

Bankers’ Pay Locked Up: Why Not Lock Up Part of Coral Gables’ Management Salaries

Interesting.

Why not lock up (say) 20 percent of the city manager’s salary, the financial manager’s salary and any other relevant functionaries’ salaries that have to do with good management and budget administration in the city of Coral Gables.  Then release all or part of the salary the following years if work is satisfactory and the budget executed properly.

According to the Wall Street Journal, for 2008 there were nearly 5,000 bonus payments in excess of $1 million at “the largest US banks that accepted Treasury aid.”

Rather the push to constrain bank executive pay comes from officials and the political elite in continental Europe – supported by an increasingly effective pro-reform group around the Bank of England (led by Mervyn King, the governor).  There is also supportive language in the Dodd-Frank financial reform bill, although this by itself rather vague and completely open to interpretation by the regulators.

Still, the overall proposal is entirely reasonable and well thought through at a general level: “lock-up” a considerable fraction of bank bonuses until we see, after several years, exactly how the banks do.

via Bankers’ Pay On The Line Again « The Baseline Scenario.

Defend Free Speech

This correctly defends the right of the press and others (including, websites like Wikileaks ) to circulate information of the government after it has been leaked by its own employees. At the very least the leaking of information by a low level functionary is a sign of serious government mismanagement and an overreaching of government’s unnecessary classification of information.

Otherwise, anyone utilizing this information might be subject to government prosecution.

It is the job of government to defend its own secrets.

…this proposed law may be constitutional as applied to government employees who unlawfully leak such material to people who are unauthorized to receive it, it would plainly violate the First Amendment to punish anyone who might publish or otherwise circulate the information after it has been leaked. At the very least, the act must be expressly limited to situations in which the spread of the classified information poses a clear and imminent danger of grave harm to the nation.

via A Clear and Present Danger to Free Speech – NYTimes.com.