Constitutional Amendment No. 5 and No. 6: Collins Center for Policy Policy
October 20, 2010 Leave a comment
Sponsor/Originator: FairDistrictsFlorida.org
Title on Ballot: Standards for Legislature to follow in
legislative redistricting
Official Summary: Legislative districts or districting
plans may not be drawn to favor or disfavor an
incumbent or political party. Districts shall not be
drawn to deny racial or language minorities the equal
opportunity to participate in the political process and
elect representatives of their choice. Districts must be
contiguous. Unless otherwise required, districts must
be compact, as equal in population as feasible, and
where feasible must make use of existing city, county
and geographical boundaries.
What it would do: Amendment 5 would require that
legislative districts not be drawn to favor one political
party over another or deny minorities equal opportunity
to participate in the political process.
Arguments for: Incumbents, both Democrat and
Republican, have traditionally drawn district boundaries
to give themselves political advantage. Redistricting
should not favor any incumbent or party.
Arguments against: The amendment might reduce
minority representation. Abiding by the amendment
would be difficult, and redistricting under its strictures
could lead to a flurry of lawsuits.
Sponsor/Originator: FairDistrictsFlorida.org
Title on Ballot: Standards for Legislature to follow in
congressional redistricting
Official Summary: Congressional districts or
districting plans may not be drawn to favor or disfavor
an incumbent or political party. Districts shall not be
drawn to deny racial or language minorities the equal
opportunity to participate in the political process and
elect representatives of their choice. Districts must be
contiguous. Unless otherwise required, districts must
be compact, as equal in population as feasible, and
where feasible must make use of existing city, county
and geographical boundaries.
What it would do: Amendment 6 would require that
congressional districts not be drawn to favor one
political party over another or deny minorities equal
opportunity to participate in the political process.
Arguments for: Incumbents, both Democrat and
Republican, have traditionally drawn district boundaries
to give themselves political advantage. Redistricting
should not favor any incumbent or party.
Arguments against: The amendment might reduce
minority representation. Abiding by the amendment
would be difficult, and redistricting under its strictures
could lead to a flurry of lawsuits.