P.S. Miami-Dade Holds the Line on Taxes! And now Coral Gables?

The Miami-Dade County Commissions have approved an austerity budget with a flat tax, significant salary and reductions of positions.

At 5:01 a.m., exactly 12 hours after the meeting began Thursday evening, county commissioners approved a $7.4 billion budget.

The winners: elderly residents who get county subsidized meals and community-based service organizations paid for through the commissioners’ discretionary funds. Both saw most of their county funding restored.

The losers: county employees who stood to lose $106 million in salary cuts under the mayor’s original budget and now stand to sacrifice another $68 million in assorted benefits.

But the number of proposed layoffs has been reduced from 1,700 to 945.

Is there a lesson for Coral Gables? Based on the well known views of Commissioners and the City Manager, the answer seems to be No.

Compare three South Florida Mayors: Alvarez, Diaz and Slesnick

Three important mayors in South Florida are due a comparison.

Mayor Alvarez (Miami-Dade County) fought to get a strong mayor form of government and he has used this power to increase salaries of colleagues and employees at the highest levels in the Mayor’s office and heads of the police force; this at a time in which literally hundreds of employees and positions will be dropped.

Mayor Diaz (City of Miami) has taken on the financial crisis to present a strongly, austere budget, he is holding the line on tax increases and he is threatening the police union with reductions unless they go along with contract changes.

Mayor Slesnick (Coral Gables) strongly favors a city spending increase returning to amounts of two years ago when taxes reductions were forced on the city (thanks to Florida legislation); the initial presentation of a large millage increase 20 percent, lowered to 14 percent in the first budget hearing; the imposition of a fire fee, and a new fee on emergency medical services in the city. The Mayor is satisfied with a modicum of positions cuts, a healthy capital projects budget and merit increases to the employees in the middle of a financial crisis.

Dear Commissioners, City of Coral Gables

The City of Coral Gables is facing a watershed moment next Tuesday, September 22. Either the City decides on a substantial reduction in salaries and benefits and the elimination of unnecessary capital spending, or the Commission will have to increase even more our taxes and fees in the years ahead.

As you know, more than anyone in Coral Gables, the conditions in the local real estate market and business and commerce may not improve much during several years, and even then conditions may get worse for a time. If the local economy does improve, it may be too little, too late.  Therefore, the current budget should not be seen as a staying in a holding pattern.

Under the current structure of salaries only another real estate bubble will save the city from budget problems–a highly unlikely event. Therefore, there is a strong justification to meet the underlying budgetary problems now.

The full weight of the decision is on your shoulders. We need your support to hold the line on millage to the fall back rate of 5.5. A rate above that will hit our families hard in the pocket books and only signal postponing key budget decisions.  Also we know that property insurance will be increasing soon, which is another reason to hold the line on taxes.

I am aware that you are considering a higher rate, but a new and different message could be sent to the community, management and unions in your next meeting.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,


Stephen E. McGaughey

Economics of the Coral Gables Budget: Expect the Worst!

The financial and economic factors affecting current and future budgets of Coral Gables are either under the direct influence of the Commission and the City Manager or outside of their control. Obviously, the main economic variables are completely out of local, regional or state control.

There are several factors under the control of management. The factors included: the number of staff; the salaries of the staff; the pension and health benefits of the staff; the organization of the government in different units; negotiations with labor unions; the hiring and firing of senior management; the timing and size of capital investments; work priorities for the government and staff; the fixing of relevant fees; operation and maintenance of vehicles and other equipment; and the assignment of different subsidized or free services to the community.

Irrespective of what happens in the local, state, national and world economy in the future, the city should proceed with the most conservative assumptions about the future economy.

To be fully responsible the Commission and management should assume the worst economic scenario in deciding on 2009-10 budget and taxes:

1) the economy is expected grow quite slowly for several years or have a double dip recession;

2) the State of Florida will lag the rebound of the national economy because of its dependence on real estate and tourism (this has been reported by several national and state analysts);

3) local businesses and employment will lag national economic recovery and, thus, local business and sales taxes will not recover quickly;

4) property values cannot be expected to grow and, indeed, will likely decline for two more years and will remain stable or slow growing after that; and

5) construction and property value expansion will not save the city from dealing with staffing and pension problems and rising debt.

This leads us all to realize that an increase in taxes and fees will almost certainly lead to increases in following years unless the Commission bites the bullet this year and reduces operating and capital spending. A serious reorganization of city government to reduce staff positions should be affected during this budget cycle.