A Little History of the Reagan Deficits

There is usually a lot of talk about the budget deficits of the Reagan and first Bush years that the presidents were not to blame, but were caused by out of control congressional spending.  Wrong.  Fully 80% of the deficits in the Reagan/Bush periods were programmed and asked for by the Presidents, and the balance, 20%, came from the Congress.

The overwhelming proportion of the deficits of the last decade [i.e., the 1980s] were already proposed in President Reagan’s and President Bush’s original budget submission. There was no explosion of federal spending over and above what the presidents had asked for. More than four-fifths of the 1980s deficits were “presidential.” Less than one-fifth were “congressional.”

via Origins of the Reagan Deficits: Hoisted from the Archives – Brad DeLong’s Grasping Reality with a Prehensile Tail.

Global Economy Doubts Affect Future Of Coral Gables

This article categorizes the risks in the growth of the global economy.

As a major center of international and regional companies, the economy of Coral Gables is no doubt directly correlated with these risks.

The risks come from the Middle East and Japan, Europe, the future of the housing market in the US, and the uncertainty about managing the US budget.

The global economy is expanding much less than it should be at this point, and the possible double dip in housing in the US will directly affect consumers and housing values in the US and, of course, in Coral Gables.

Thus there will be continuing and serious risks in the budget, spending and taxes of the city of Coral Gables with the need to make serious and permanent reductions in operating costs of the city through pension reform, the Biltmore lease renegotiations and the city’s internal organization and staffing.

First, and foremost, the world as a whole has yet to deal fully with the economic consequences of unrest in the Middle East and the tragedies in Japan. While ongoing for weeks or months, these events have not yet produced their full disruptive impact on the global economy. It is not often that the world finds itself facing the stagflationary risk of lower demand and lower supply at the same time. And it is even more unusual to have two distinct developments leading to such an outcome. Yet such is the case today.

The Middle Eastern uprisings have pushed oil prices higher, eating up consumer purchasing power while raising input prices for many producers. At the same time, Japan’s trifecta of calamities – the massive earthquake, devastating tsunami, and paralyzing nuclear disaster – have gutted consumer confidence and disrupted cross-border production chains (especially in technology and car factories).

The second big global risk comes from Europe, where Germany’s strong performance is coinciding with a debt crisis on the European Union’s periphery. Last week, Portugal joined Greece and Ireland in seeking an official bailout to avoid a default that would undermine Europe’s banking system. In exchange for emergency loans, all three countries have embarked on massive austerity. Yet, despite the tremendous social pain, this approach will make no dent in their large and rising debt overhang.

Meanwhile, housing in the United States is weakening again – the third large global risk. Even though home prices have already fallen sharply, there has been no meaningful rebound. Indeed, in some areas, prices are again under downward pressure, which could worsen if mortgage finance becomes less readily available and more expensive, as is possible.

With housing being such a critical driver of consumer behavior, any further substantial fall in home prices will sap confidence and lower spending. It will also make relocating even more difficult for Americans in certain parts of the country, aggravating the long-term-unemployment problem.

Finally, there is the increasingly visible fiscal predicament in the US, the world’s largest economy – and the one that provides the “global public goods” that are so critical to the healthy functioning of the world economy. Having used fiscal spending aggressively to avoid a depression, the US must now commit to a credible medium-term path of fiscal consolidation. This will involve difficult choices, delicate execution, and uncertain outcomes for both the federal government and the US Federal Reserve.

via How Risky is the Global Economy? by Mohamed A. El-Erian – Project Syndicate.

A Test For Democracy: Will City of Coral Gables Start Spending Again?

Seems like there is certain pressure from businesses and a willing disposition of the city manager and some commissioners to start spending big on city projects.  It is said that we can do that because interest rates are low–not a good financial reason.

There is pressure from Chamber of Commerce, Miracle Mile businesses and the IBD to undertake the Miracle Mile and Giralda Streetscape Project.  This is (and I underline) estimated to cost $16 million.  You can bet that the project will cost more after government and businesses get their hands on the “vision” project.  Why is this called the Miracle Mile Streetscape anyway, when it includes Giralda.  Why include Giralda?  Are you sure that this project will “pay for itself?”

One commissioner has already talked about spending money on parks and a senior center and speaks fondly of the free (subsidized) trolley and the Ponce street upgrading.  Good projects, but can we afford more of them now?  I think not.  Why should the taxpayers subsidize the trolley. (By the way, subsidizing the trolley takes business away from the city parking lots, so the real subsidies are much larger than the operating and maintenance costs of the trolley).

Let’s hear from the mayor and commissioners just three goals: we need to fix pensions and hold salaries down for several years, freeze or reduce taxes and fix the Biltmore lease, and freeze and reduce salaries.  Please, no more studies are needed–just decisions and actions by the commissioners.

Failure to do any of these will mean failure for the city’s finances and more taxes for us all in Coral Gables.

Please, Mr. Kerdyk, No More Spending

I sincerely wish that Mr. Kerdyk at his investiture this morning had not listed his spending priorities, including purchasing more green space.  While green space is a highly laudable and good priority with which I agree, we should start by fixing our financial problems, avoiding more taxes, fixing pensions, etc. (we know the list), before we start spending money on green space or even Miracle Mile.  Borrowing money, even at a low rate, still has to be repaid by future generations of taxpayers.