Coral Gables Citizens Recognized in Pension Battles

Two points are worth making.

The Teamster Union occupied roughly 90 percent of the seats in the city chambers.

Also, the proceedings were not shown on Coral Gables TV as they should have been and as they had been in similar impasse hearing (as was noted by Commissioner Cabrera).  Mayor Slesnick  dismissed citizens’ views from the start of the meeting by attacking an ad in the Miami Herald calling attention to the event.  The city failed to broadcast the event on the halls outside of the chamber.

Thus there is a pattern in Coral Gables of avoiding public views and comments by its citizens on unpleasant topics.

The Coral Gables commission chamber can seat some five dozen observers. During a special hearing last week on the city’s pension benefits, all but a handful of those seats were occupied by bodies clad in white Teamsters T-shirts.

Among the spattering of dark business suits that refused to blend in with the white-washed wave of public-employee-union representation were those of Katherine Newman and Sandra Murado.

It wasn’t just their attire that made them conspicuous; it was the reason for their presence. They aren’t public employees or city consultants or public officials. They’re simply concerned citizens, and that’s a rare breed at the often monotonous forums that are public hearings.

“It’s hard for me to imagine why more people don’t get involved,” says Newman, an accountant and Coral Gables resident who becomes angry when she thinks about a city communications operator who retired with a $65,000-a-year pension or about how 23 cents of every dollar in the city’s budget goes to pay pensions.

Coral Gables is hardly an anomaly. Cities throughout the region are in the midst of some of the most important financial decisions they will make in years as they battle public-employee unions to tackle rapidly spiraling employee and retiree costs.

Just as the employee-compensation decisions that public officials made in the past are now bearing down on taxpayers, the decisions they now make will play a major role in determining residents’ future obligations. Yet you’d never know it by the dearth of citizen involvement — compared to employee-union presence — at many budget meetings.

via Pension battles require citizens who take action – Jackie Bueno Sousa – MiamiHerald.com.

Bad Prognostications for Coral Gables’ Future

Being cautious in trying to resolve the budget crisis in Coral Gables is equally dangerous.

…the administration has lost credibility with the public and the chances of a renewed fiscal expansion have disappeared. With the Federal Reserve cautious, too, the likelihood of a lengthy period of weak growth and heavy joblessness is high. So, too, are the chances of domestic and global political friction.

via FT.com / Columnists / Martin Wolf – Obama was too cautious in fearful times.

History of Pension Reform in The Coral Gables Commission

During the recent Impasse Hearing it was stated that since 2001 the current Commission had not approved any of the prevailing pension rules.  Thus implying that the Commission is not responsible for the pension liabilities and that the commission is not responsible for the current problems.

However, the Commission did approve salary increases since 2001 that have dramatically driven up pension liabilities, and one may assume that they did this knowing about the extraordinary pension liabilities being accrued by the city.

I suggest that we have only the city manager and the economic crisis to thank for the new pension and salary initiatives.

Coral Gables: Teamsters and other Unions At Odds With The Taxpayers

Next to the City Commission, which has been unable to resolve the growing financial problems of the city, the police, firefighter and, now the general employee unions, are opposed to finding a solution to the financial stability of the city.  There views are that the city of Coral Gables is a wealthy community and able to finance well paid employees.  If this was true Coral Gables would be the only city or county in the whole US that is in that category.

The choices are clear, and they have been made clear by the the city manager.  Either the unions accept salaries and benefits that are reasonable and sustainable (and, indeed, I would say competitive) in the coming years or see the number of positions fall.  While the public security personnel contend that they are indispensalbe to the city, there is no single employee, either supervisor or staff feel that are indispensable to the future of the city.  The unions’ arrogance is only exceeded by their indifference to the heavy penalties the citizens are paying through higher and higher property taxes to pay their salaries, pensions and other multiple benefits.

Quoting the Teamsters from the contract negotiations (and the recent Impasse Hearing), “…it is difficult to believe that Coral Gables has transformed itself from prince to pauper within the space of a few years…” and “Apparently marginally increased taxes during a time of economic uncertainty are not the price that will be paid by Coral Gables’ affluent resident…”.  How out of touch can a union be.