Where are the City’s Reserves and Capital Improvements?

In the recent Budget Hearing the mayor and commissioners (e.g., Mr. Withers) explained the need for high wages and pensions for public security staff (and by implication all other employees) and justified this by a tight labor market in Miami.

A cursory look at Bureau of Labor Statistic data for the last decade in the Miami area for firefighters and police patrol officers do not show a rise in salaries similar to that which occurred in Coral Gables during the period 1999 and 2007 (overall wage payments rose by about 7 percent on average in Coral Gables).

In the Miami regions the average salary for firefighters increased from $42,000 in 1999 to $54,000 in 2007. This an average annual rate of 3.2% per annum that approximately covers inflation during the period. For police patrol staff the wages increased from 44,100 in 1999 to 57,800 in 2007. This is also an average rate of 3.4% in the period without in major fluctuations on a year to year basis.

This suggests that the market for these workers was not especially tight in the period in which Coral Gables dramatically increased salaries and benefits and wages were good and they more than kept up with inflation.

City income increased dramatically during the real estate bubble that lead to an average annual increase in property tax revenues for the city of almost 12%, and total revenues increases of about 10%. Under these circumstances the city should be sitting on an ocean of reserves and top notch capital improvements.

Rather the funds were squandered in exaggerated salaries and pension benefits that has left the city with immense pension liabilities that have “come home to roost” because tax revenues are falling dramatically now and will not grow in coming years.

Simple Budget Reductions: CGGAZETTE.COM did the Manager’s Job

Coral Gable’s Commission likely nemesis, George Volsky did a “back of the envelope” budget reduction.

Question? Couldn’t the city manager had an estimate ready at the last Budget Hearing, or did he want more time to pressure the Commission into accepting a higher millage rate–in other words, a simple, old fashioned, delaying tactic.

TOTAL: $3,944,000

The…savings do not represent major personnel firings. It suggests retiring several highly paid (and less-than-efficient) directors who continue in their jobs even though under DROP they could voluntarily leave at any time. By continuing to work they accumulate additional retirement payments from the city already enmeshed in a serious pension crisis.

The Miami Herald Can’t Calculate

This is a gross mistake by reporter Elaine de Valle of the Miami Herald. A rate of 5.995 mentioned by the Mayor represents a 14% increase over 2008-2009 rate of 5.25. Even if the commission settles on a 5.75 rate that would be close to a 10% percent increase. That is a full real rate increase since there is has been no inflation this year.

He said he believes the tax rate will go down Tuesday when the city commission votes at its final budget hearing. Earlier this month, commissioners adopted a preliminary 5.995 tax rate, an 8.27 increase over the previous year’s rate.

The higher rate reflects the city’s lower property values and higher costs.

Mr. Slesnick refers to a tax rate decrease when it is really a 14% or 10% increase! How curious.  This sounds like misinformation to confuse Coral Gables residents who will certainly discover the truth when they get their final property tax bills.

A Few Questions on the Budget

1. Why should the citizens finance merit increases during a period of economic austerity and no inflation.

2. Can you tell me if the Museum amount included in this year’s capital budget is fully financed by the nonprofit contributions or is the city financing a good part of this expenditure?

3. Is the capital budget a multi-year or a one year budget. Please show us a multi-year budget.  Small expenditures in one year (e.g., the museum design, preparation and construction) invariably lead to multi-year expenditures that are justified on the earlier smaller expenditures.

3. In the capital budget, which projects are fully financed out of donations and other sources and do not require additional borrowing or property taxes payments?

4. Is there no information on the 2008-09 budget execution? Why does the city always compare the “budget” of the prior year with the new “budget” instead of the actual budget results. We should be comparing our 2009 budget with the actual final (including estimates for the last month) execution of the 2008-09 budget?

5. Why hasn’t the Building and Zoning staff be reduced even more?  With the fall in permit fees many staff are not justified.